← 返回巴西资讯
巴西资讯巴西金融监管

巴西多市场基金业洗牌,三大老牌基金经理资产缩水

分享

Brazil’s hedge fund pioneers adapt to a changing industry

自2022年货币紧缩以来,巴西多市场基金行业经历结构性调整,三大知名基金经理管理的宏观策略资产大幅缩水,行业走向整合与转型。

巴西多市场基金行业正经历结构性洗牌。自2022年货币紧缩周期开始以来,投资者配置发生大规模转移,导致三位最知名基金经理——Verde的Luis Stuhlberger、SPX的Rogério Xavier和JGP的André Jakurski——管理的宏观策略资产缩水。三家公司目前合计管理资产超过950亿雷亚尔,较2021年的1275亿雷亚尔明显下降。

最新变化来自Gávea Investimentos,这家由前央行行长Arminio Fraga创立的公司关闭了其宏观基金管理业务。其他主要独立机构则选择了不同路径:Verde去年将多数股权出售给Vinci Compass,SPX和JGP近期也经历了调整以求适应。

据Anbima数据,2022年至2025年间,多市场基金净流出6603亿雷亚尔;今年截至8月底,该类别又流出157亿雷亚尔。2016年至疫情后独立资产管理公司大量涌现的局面,已让位于整合与赎回潮。

一位跟踪该行业二十年的观察人士表示:“这些人非常出色,但他们在1990年代末拥有的优势已经消失。竞争急剧加剧,信息获取方式变了,人工智能驱动的量化模型如今广泛可用。”

Bradesco Asset Management投资解决方案主管Adilson Ferrarezi指出,二十年前知名基金经理主要相互竞争,如今竞争已远超多市场类别。ETF在投资组合配置中扮演越来越重要的角色,费率制咨询模式逐渐兴起,两位数的利率也让投资者留在固定收益领域,而基金表现令人失望更加剧了行业困境。他说:“投资者现在要求真正的阿尔法,他们不想为伪装的贝塔(市场风险)付费。”

Ferrarezi预计巴西将跟随全球市场的转型,从以单一投资愿景人物主导宏观策略的模式,转向围绕治理和风险管理、不依赖任何个人的更规范方法。

UBS Global Wealth Management巴西流动另类投资主管Guilherme Zaczac则认为,这些传奇人物并未失去投资能力。他说:“没有人忘记如何管理资金。他们仍然非常擅长自己的本行,而且正进入一个可能极好的机会窗口,因为机会很多。”他指出,赎回潮的一个好处是规模较小的基金更容易建仓和平仓。管理150亿或700亿雷亚尔的策略,无论投资判断对错,进出交易的成本都可能很高。

Zaczac还表示,回顾来看,一个教训是行业在2025年和2026年未能足够仔细地审视基金持仓,否则可能发现策略之间的相关性异常之高,经理们在巴西和海外利率上采取了相似的方向性头寸。

这条资讯对你有帮助吗?

信息概要

类型
行业趋势
方向
巴西
分类
金融监管
层级
编辑整理
话题
金融行业趋势企业动态
查看原文(英语)

Brazil’s hedge fund pioneers adapt to a changing industry

Brazil’s multimarket fund industry is undergoing a structural shake-up that is forcing even its founding figures to rethink their business models. A massive shift in investor allocations since the monetary tightening cycle began in 2022 has eroded assets in macro strategies run by three of the country’s most prominent managers: Luis Stuhlberger of Verde, Rogério Xavier of SPX and André Jakurski of JGP. “These guys are brilliant, but the edge they had in the late 1990s is gone,” said an industry observer who has followed the sector for two decades. “Competition has increased dramatically, access to information has changed, and quantitative models powered by artificial intelligence are now widely available.” XP Asset challenges ‘2 and 20’ fee model for macro funds Credit-heavy funds see R$49bn in redemptions During the era of low interest rates, some funds grew too large for Brazil’s domestic market and were forced to diversify overseas. But international markets are more efficient, and Brazilian managers must compete with global heavyweights such as Bridgewater, Duquesne Capital, PIMCO and Pershing Square. Industry consolidation The latest sign of the changing landscape came when Gávea Investimentos, founded by former Central Bank Chair Arminio Fraga, shut down its macro fund management operations. Other leading independent firms have been pursuing different paths. Verde sold a majority stake to Vinci Compass last year, while SPX and JGP have undergone recent changes as they seek to adapt. Together, the three firms manage more than R$95 billion, including roughly R$15 billion at Verde, R$32.3 billion at JGP and R$48 billion at SPX. In 2021, when investors were diversifying their portfolios amid ultra-low interest rates, their combined assets stood at R$127.5 billion. SPX subsequently reached its own peak of R$80 billion in 2022. Contacted by Valor, none of the firms agreed to an interview. The proliferation of independent asset managers between 2016 and the period following the pandemic has given way to a wave of consolidation and withdrawals. Multimarket, or multi-assets, funds suffered net outflows of R$660.3 billion between 2022 and 2025, data from Anbima, the Brazilian Financial and Capital Markets Association, show. Another R$15.7 billion left the category through the end of August this year. Changing investor demands Two decades ago, prominent fund managers competed primarily against one another, often operating firms where the founder made the key investment decisions. Today, competition extends well beyond the multimarket category, said Adilson Ferrarezi, head of investment solutions at Bradesco Asset Management, which took over Gávea’s multimarket fund. Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are playing an increasingly important role in portfolio allocations as fee-based advisory models, in which clients pay directly for investment advice, gain traction. Double-digit interest rates have also kept investors in fixed income, while disappointing fund performance has compounded the industry's challenges. “Investors now demand genuine alpha. They don’t want to pay fees for disguised beta [market risk],” Ferrarezi said. In the past, investors bought into a manager’s reputation: Verde because of Stuhlberger, Gávea because of Fraga, SPX because of Xavier, Adam because of Marcio Appel, or Ibiuna because of former Central Bank officials Rodrigo Azevedo and Mario Torós. Now, they want to understand precisely which risk factors drive returns. “That changes everything. Many of these exposures can be obtained directly through cheaper ETF instruments or tax-exempt credit investments,” he said. Ferrarezi expects Brazil to follow a transition already seen in global markets, moving away from a model centered on a single investment visionary responsible for macro strategy toward a more disciplined approach built around governance and risk management, without relying on any one individual. Smaller funds, greater flexibility Yet the legendary figures of Brazil’s independent asset management industry have lost none of their appeal or investment expertise, said Guilherme Zaczac, head of liquid alternatives in Brazil at UBS Global Wealth Management. “No one has forgotten how to manage money. They’re still extremely good at what they do, and they’re entering what could be a fantastic window of opportunity, because opportunities are plentiful,” he said. One upside of the wave of redemptions is that smaller funds can build or unwind positions more easily. In a strategy managing R$15 billion or R$70 billion, the cost of entering and exiting trades can be substantial, whether the investment call proves right or wrong, Zaczac explained. “When you’re right, you pay to get in and out. And when you’re wrong, triggering a stop-loss [closing a position to limit losses] is expensive. With smaller funds, the chances of generating returns are much greater,” he said. Lessons in risk management Looking back, Zaczac said one lesson was the industry's failure to scrutinize fund positioning closely enough in 2025 and 2026. That might have revealed unusually high correlations among strategies, with managers taking similar directional positions in interest rates both in Brazil and overseas. “We saw a different kind of market move, but that’s something you can only analyze in hindsight. It’s part of the game.”

觉得有价值?

分享给需要了解巴西市场的朋友

帮助更多中国企业看懂巴西,做成生意

China Brazil Insight · 看懂巴西,做成生意

更多专题研究见 研究中心