← 返回巴西资讯
巴西资讯巴西宏观市场2026年7月27日

AI生成博索纳罗拉票视频遭投诉,在巴中企需关注选举合规红线

分享

Jair Bolsonaro AI video challenged at Brazil’s top courts

巴西工人党就自由党使用AI生成前总统博索纳罗视频拉票向最高法院和选举法院投诉,该视频可能违反深度伪造禁令,中资企业需警惕2026年大选前政治宣传合规风险。

为什么值得关注

涉及巴西选举法对AI深度伪造的禁令及2026年大选前合规红线,直接影响在巴中企政治宣传和社交媒体运营策略。

巴西工人党及“巴西希望”联盟于周日(26日)向巴西最高法院和最高选举法院投诉,指控自由党在圣保罗全国代表大会上播放了一段由AI生成的46秒视频,视频中前总统雅伊尔·博索纳罗的虚拟形象以第一人称发言,为其子弗拉维奥·博索纳罗的总统候选人资格拉票。该视频于周六(25日)播放,虽开头标注由AI生成,但法律专家指出其可能违反最高选举法院关于禁止深度伪造的规则。对于在巴西经营的中资企业而言,此案标志着巴西选举监管机构对AI技术在政治宣传中使用边界的严格审查,尤其是在正式竞选期(2026年8月16日)前,任何涉及候选人形象或声音的合成内容都可能触发合规风险。

工人党及“巴西希望”联盟(由劳工党、巴西共产党和绿党组成)于周日(26日)向巴西最高法院和最高选举法院提交投诉,指控自由党在圣保罗举行的全国代表大会上播放了一段由人工智能生成的视频。视频中,前总统雅伊尔·博索纳罗的虚拟形象以第一人称发言,最初警告观众该视频由AI生成,随后批评对前总统的限制并表达对其子弗拉维奥·博索纳罗总统候选人资格的支持。该视频时长46秒,于周六(25日)的代表大会上播放,并在YouTube上直播。工人党认为,此举违反了亚历山大·德·莫赖斯法官的明确命令,即禁止博索纳罗在软禁期间传播政治或选举信息,包括通过第三方传播,“无论使用何种手段”。博索纳罗正在服终审判决,政治权利已被暂停。工人党还向最高选举法院指出,代表大会包含明确的拉票行为及不当使用人工智能,要求对弗拉维奥的竞选活动处以罚款,并从社交媒体上删除该视频。

对于在巴西的中资企业,此案具有直接警示意义。尽管底稿未涉及中资企业直接影响,但通过巴西选举法对深度伪造的禁令传导至企业合规层面:中资企业若在2026年大选期间进行任何政治宣传或与候选人合作,需严格避免使用AI生成候选人形象或声音的内容,即使标注“由AI生成”也不能豁免违规风险。巴西最高选举法院第23,610/2019号决议第9-C条第1款明确禁止在有利于或损害候选人时,使用数字创建、替换或更改他人图像或声音的合成音频或视频,无论当事人是否授权。此外,正式竞选期(2026年8月16日)前,任何拉票行为均可能被认定为违规。中资企业应关注自身社交媒体运营、广告投放及与当地政治人物的互动,避免因技术使用不当卷入选举纠纷。

CBI解读:底稿显示,法律专家对视频是否违反博索纳罗软禁限制存在分歧。选举法教授费尔南多·内塞尔表示,自2024年起此类技术已被禁止,视频开头披露由AI生成并不能使其合法化。而选举律师阿尔贝托·罗洛则认为,因活动发生在正式竞选期前,不存在选举违规,且AI标注显示“法律谨慎态度”。CBI认为,最高选举法院内部主流观点是,正式竞选期开始后候选人可使用AI生成的自己拉票视频,但需明确标识;然而在其他情况下,AI不能用于生成虚假内容。这意味着中资企业在2026年8月16日后的宣传中,若使用AI技术,必须确保内容真实、不误导,并遵守标识要求。此案与2024年巴西选举法院对深度伪造的禁令趋势一致,显示出巴西监管机构对AI政治应用的零容忍态度。

待观察:1)最高法院和最高选举法院对工人党投诉的裁决结果,特别是是否认定博索纳罗软禁期间违规;2)最高选举法院是否在2026年8月16日前出台更明确的AI选举使用细则;3)弗拉维奥·博索纳罗的候选人资格是否因此案受影响,以及自由党是否会调整竞选策略。中资企业应持续跟踪上述动态,以评估政治环境变化对业务运营的潜在影响。

CBI 观察编辑判断

事实:工人党投诉基于AI视频可能违反深度伪造禁令和博索纳罗软禁限制,法律专家对此存在分歧。CBI认为,无论裁决结果如何,此案已明确释放信号——巴西选举监管机构对AI政治内容持严格审查态度,中资企业应主动建立内部合规审查机制,避免在2026年大选期间使用任何未经授权的AI生成政治内容。

这条资讯对你有帮助吗?

信息概要

类型
风险事件
方向
巴西
分类
宏观市场
层级
编辑整理
地点
在巴西经营的中资企业、涉及政治宣传的社交媒体及广告投放方
核验
待核验
对象
在巴中资企业法务团队税务合规负责人
话题
政治法律科技

来源信息

来源
Valor International
原文标题
Jair Bolsonaro AI video challenged at Brazil’s top courts
原始语言
英语
原文链接
查看原文 →
编辑
Clara Lin
查看原文(英语

Jair Bolsonaro AI video challenged at Brazil’s top courts

Bolsonaro avatar shown at Liberal Party national convention in São Paulo Maria Isabel Oliveira/O Globo The Workers’ Party and the Brazil of Hope federation, which brings together the PT, Communist Party of Brazil and Green Party, filed complaints with the Supreme Court and the Superior Electoral Court on Sunday (26) over the use of an artificial intelligence-generated video depicting former President Jair Bolsonaro at the event that formally launched his son Flávio Bolsonaro’s presidential candidacy in São Paulo. Legal experts say the video may have violated electoral rules banning deepfakes, although they disagree on whether it also breached restrictions imposed on Jair Bolsonaro as part of his house arrest. Brazil summons Argentine envoy after Milei insults Lula Flávio Bolsonaro’s voting claims trigger criticism, legal challenge Centrist alliance leans toward neutrality, isolating Flávio Bolsonaro The 46-second video was shown at Saturday’s convention. In it, the simulated Bolsonaro speaks in the first person and initially warns viewers that the footage was generated by AI. The video then criticizes restrictions imposed on the former president and expresses support for Flávio Bolsonaro. Supreme Court challenge At the Supreme Court, the Workers’ Party (PT) filed a petition as part of proceedings involving the enforcement of Jair Bolsonaro’s sentence. The party argued that showing the video violated an explicit order from Justice Alexandre de Moraes barring the former president from disseminating political or electoral messages, including through third parties, “regardless of the means used.” Jair Bolsonaro is serving a final sentence, meaning there are no further avenues for appeal. His political rights have also been suspended as a result of his conviction. Justice Moraes has ruled that the former president cannot make political statements while serving his sentence. The PT argued that Saturday’s episode, which was also broadcast live on YouTube, amounted to a “deliberate and now technologically sophisticated repetition of the same pattern of conduct that this court recognized and sanctioned less than ten days ago.” Electoral complaint In its filing with the Superior Electoral Court (TSE), the party said the convention included an explicit appeal for votes and the improper use of artificial intelligence. It is seeking a fine against Flávio’s campaign and the removal of the video from social media. “Electoral law prohibits any type of deepfake in political or electoral content, and even though the ban is expressly established by the TSE, the PL broadcast a synthetic video reproducing Jair Bolsonaro’s face and voice, with an appeal for votes for Flávio Bolsonaro, and also disseminated it online,” the party said. Fernando Neisser, an election law professor at Getulio Vargas Foundation in São Paulo, said the use of such technology has been prohibited since 2024. The ban is set out in paragraph 1 of Article 9-C of TSE Resolution 23,610/2019, which was amended that year ahead of Brazil’s municipal elections. The current rule expressly prohibits synthetic audio or video that digitally creates, replaces or alters a person’s image or voice when used to favor or harm a candidacy, even when the person portrayed has authorized it. “It is prohibited to use, to harm or favor a candidacy, synthetic content in audio, video or a combination of both that has been digitally generated or manipulated, even with authorization, to create, replace or alter the image or voice of a living, deceased or fictional person (deepfake),” the resolution says. Neisser said the disclosure at the start of the video that it had been generated by AI does not make its use permissible. The TSE requires some AI-generated content to be labeled, but that requirement does not override the ban on deepfakes. “There are permitted uses, as long as they are labeled, and uses that are absolutely prohibited, even with a label. Creating a deepfake image or video is absolutely prohibited. Labeling it does not solve the problem,” Neisser said. He believes the violation could provide grounds for the candidacy to be revoked. Legal disagreement Election lawyer Alberto Rollo takes a different view. He said there was no electoral violation because the event took place outside the official campaign period, which begins on August 16. Rollo also said the disclosure at the beginning of the video that it had been generated using AI showed the campaign had exercised “legal caution.” “The voter cannot be deceived. And that was done yesterday [Saturday]; nobody was deceived,” he said. Valor has learned that the prevailing view within the TSE has been that, once the official campaign period begins on August 16, a candidate could use an AI-generated video of themselves asking for votes as long as the material is clearly identified as artificial intelligence. In other circumstances, however, the electoral courts have taken the position that AI cannot be used to generate speeches or statements attributed to other people, even when those individuals authorize the use of their image. Early campaigning Another issue under debate is whether the video amounted to premature electoral campaigning. The TSE has held that party conventions used to launch candidacies cannot include explicit appeals for votes or other campaign activities directed at the broader public before the official campaign period begins. When appeals for votes made during conventions extend beyond the party setting, they can be classified as premature campaigning and result in fines. In 2024, for example, the TSE upheld a decision by Maranhão’s Regional Electoral Court against a pre-candidate for mayor of Afonso Cunha, in Maranhão state. He had organized a motorcade immediately after the convention that confirmed his candidacy in the 2020 elections. Jair Bolsonaro restrictions Legal experts also disagree on whether the AI video was an attempt to circumvent restrictions stemming from Jair Bolsonaro’s house arrest and conviction. Election law attorney and researcher Kaleo Guaraty said there was a risk that the Supreme Court’s restrictions had been breached, although “that depends on proving that he [Jair Bolsonaro] knew about or consented to the production.” Rollo compared the AI avatar to the use of a Bolsonaro doll. In his view, the video was similar because viewers were explicitly told that the image was not the real Jair Bolsonaro. Neisser disagrees. He said the video may also violate Article 337 of Brazil’s Electoral Code, which prohibits citizens who do not have full political rights from participating in party activities. Jair Bolsonaro’s political rights were suspended after his conviction in the coup-plot case became final. “There was a clear attempt to circumvent this rule, which prevents a person with a final criminal conviction from participating in the country’s political life while serving their sentence, through the use of artificial intelligence,” Neisser said. Flávio Bolsonaro’s pre-campaign did not respond to requests for comment before publication.

觉得有价值?

分享给需要了解巴西市场的朋友

帮助更多中国企业看懂巴西,做成生意

China Brazil Insight · 中巴合作价值链中的信息节点

这条资讯影响你的业务吗?

CBI 提供从信息到行动的完整支持