← 返回巴西资讯
巴西资讯巴西宏观市场2026年8月1日

巴西社会流动性研究:贫困家庭子女进入前10%概率仅1.3%

分享

Study measures Brazil’s low social mobility

巴西最新社会流动地图集显示阶层固化严重,贫困家庭子女向上流动概率极低,教育质量不足是主因,对在巴中资企业的人力资源策略和消费市场判断具有参考价值。

为什么值得关注

巴西社会流动性数据揭示劳动力市场结构性特征,影响在巴中资企业的用工策略、市场分层判断及长期投资决策。

巴西社会流动与发展研究所(Imds)与Prospera Lab合作发布的最新版《社会流动地图集》显示,巴西社会阶层固化现象严重。研究追踪1983年至1990年出生的儿童,比较其父母收入组与成年后(25-29岁)收入,发现出生于最贫困25%家庭的儿童,成年后进入最富裕25%群体的概率仅为8.3%,进入收入前10%的概率仅为1.3%,而留在最贫困群体的概率高达48%。相比之下,出生于最富裕25%家庭的儿童,有54.5%的概率留在该群体,30.9%的概率进入收入前10%。数据来源包括巴西地理与统计研究所(IBGE)的全国住户连续抽样调查(Pnad Contínua)、联邦税务局、劳动部和社会发展部。

该研究基于1983年至1990年出生人群,将样本分为1983-1987和1988-1990两个亚组进行对比,发现流动性略有改善但仍处于低位。较老组中,贫困家庭子女进入最富裕25%的概率为7.9%,较年轻组为8.8%;富裕家庭子女留在原群体的概率从58.9%降至53.9%。Imds首席执行官、经济学家Paulo Tafner表示:“巴西社会不幸是一个封闭的社会。教育是流动的关键驱动因素,但学习成果仍然薄弱,教育支出增加并未转化为质量提升。”

底稿未涉及中资企业直接影响,但通过劳动力市场和消费结构两个机制间接传导。对于在巴中资制造业企业,该数据意味着基层劳动力中来自贫困家庭的员工比例较高,其技能提升空间受限,企业培训投入的回报周期可能较长。对于消费品和电商平台企业,阶层固化意味着低收入群体的消费升级速度慢于预期,市场分层明显,高端与大众市场之间的跨越难度较大。涉及巴西监管机构方面,教育质量议题关联教育部(MEC)和基础教育发展指数(Ideb),但底稿未提及具体政策调整。

底稿显示,性别、种族和出生地等结构性不平等因素显著影响流动概率。贫困家庭中,白人子女留在最贫困群体的比例为36.3%,非白人子女为51.6%;儿子留在最贫困群体的比例为32.9%,女儿则高达65.1%。Tafner指出,女性劳动参与率低限制了向上流动,棕色人种和黑人教育水平较低导致收入较低。地区差异同样突出:阿克雷州(Acre)贫困家庭子女留在最贫困群体的概率最高(61.6%);北部和东北部14个州中,超过一半贫困家庭子女可能留在最低收入组。CBI认为,这些结构性数据对中资企业选址和用工策略具有参考意义——巴西北部和东北部劳动力成本可能长期偏低,但技能提升速度也将慢于东南部。

该平台还提供38项社会经济指标,涵盖教育、健康、经济、社会和公共支出五个维度。CBI观察,教育质量与流动性之间的强关联意味着,巴西若推进教育体制改革,可能在未来5-10年逐步改善劳动力素质,但短期内中资企业仍需面对技能型人才供给不足的现实。

待观察:一是Imds是否发布基于更年轻人群(1990年后出生)的更新数据,以验证流动性改善趋势是否持续;二是巴西国会或教育部是否针对教育质量提出新的改革方案,特别是基础教育阶段的考核标准调整;三是北部和东北部各州是否出台区域性人才补贴政策,影响中资企业在该地区的用工成本。

CBI 观察编辑判断

底稿数据表明巴西社会流动性处于低位且改善缓慢,教育质量是核心瓶颈。CBI认为,这一结构性现实短期内不会改变,中资企业应基于阶层固化背景调整人力资源本地化策略和产品定价分层,而非期待快速的社会结构变迁。

这条资讯对你有帮助吗?

信息概要

类型
市场数据
方向
巴西
分类
宏观市场
层级
编辑整理
地点
在巴中资制造业、消费品及电商企业,以及依赖本地劳动力的投资者。
核验
待核验
对象
在巴中资企业投资者人力资源负责人
话题
行业趋势政策

来源信息

来源
Valor International
原文标题
Study measures Brazil’s low social mobility
原始语言
英语
原文链接
查看原文 →
编辑
Clara Lin
查看原文(英语

Study measures Brazil’s low social mobility

Paulo Tafner Leo Pinheiro/Valor In Brazil, where income inequality remains deeply entrenched, social mobility for children from low-income families is also limited. Children born into the poorest 25% of households have only an 8.3% chance of reaching the wealthiest 25% in adulthood, while just 1.3% make it into the top 10% of income earners. At the same time, they have a 48% probability of remaining in the poorest 25%. Social mobility improves, but remains fragile in Brazil Inequality limits access to opportunities and rights, study shows How inequality and low mobility fuel Brazil’s criminal labor market The slingshot and the elephant: education’s limits against inequality By contrast, children born into the top 25% of the income distribution have a 54.5% chance of remaining in that group and a 30.9% probability of moving into the top 10% of earners. The findings are part of the latest edition of the Social Mobility Atlas, a data platform developed by the Institute for Social Mobility and Development (Imds) in partnership with Prospera Lab. The study tracked the trajectories of children born between 1983 and 1990, comparing their parents’ income group with the children’s earnings as adults aged 25 to 29. The analysis draws on data from multiple sources, including the Continuous National Household Sample Survey (Pnad Contínua) conducted by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), Brazil’s Federal Revenue Service, and the Ministries of Labor and Social Development. “Brazilian society is, unfortunately, a closed society. Education is a fundamental driver of social mobility. In Brazil, educational access has improved, but learning outcomes remain very weak. Increased spending on education has not translated into better quality,” said economist Paulo Tafner, chief executive of Imds, which he co-founded with former Central Bank President Arminio Fraga. In a second analysis, researchers divided the group born between 1983 and 1990 into two subgroups (1983-1987 and 1988-1990) to assess changes in social mobility over time. The figures show some improvement in the chances of upward mobility, but they remain low, according to Tafner. “When the two subgroups are compared, it is possible to see that mobility increased slightly, by an amount that is statistically significant, but it is still very low. We continue to see limited opportunities for upward mobility.” In this comparison, those born into the poorest 25% in the older group had a 7.9% probability of reaching the wealthiest 25%. Among the younger group, that figure rose to 8.8%. Meanwhile, for children from families already in the top 25% of the income distribution, the probability of remaining there declined from 58.9% to 53.9%, respectively. Well-known inequality factors such as gender, race, and place of birth also weigh heavily on the likelihood of upward mobility. Among white young adults born into the poorest 25% of families, 36.3% remain in that income group as adults. Among non-white individuals, that figure rises to 51.6%. When considering the same poorest 25% of households, 32.9% of sons remain in the same income bracket in adulthood, while among daughters the share is nearly twice as high, at 65.1%. “Those well-known sociodemographic characteristics have a decisive impact on social mobility,” said the Imds chief executive. According to Tafner, women’s lower participation in the labor market limits their opportunities for upward mobility. “Brown and Black people also experience lower mobility. Their average educational attainment is lower, and their earnings are lower as well, largely because of that educational gap. That limits mobility,” he noted. Regionally, Acre is the state where children born into the poorest 25% of households are most likely to remain in that same income group as adults, with a probability of 61.6%. Overall, in 14 Brazilian states—all located in the North and Northeast—more than half of children born into the poorest quarter of the population are likely to remain in that lowest-income group. The Social Mobility Atlas platform also provides data on 38 socioeconomic indicators for Brazilian municipalities that can be correlated with social mobility across five dimensions: education, health, the economy, society, and public spending. Check the full study here (in Portuguese): atlasmobilidadesocial.org.br

觉得有价值?

分享给需要了解巴西市场的朋友

帮助更多中国企业看懂巴西,做成生意

China Brazil Insight · 中巴合作价值链中的信息节点

这条资讯影响你的业务吗?

CBI 提供从信息到行动的完整支持