{"editorial":{"content_id":"4f3a9749-a091-42f1-9ef7-566988ae5a20","slug":"article-20261109-74d7ee","content_type":"news","title":"巴西高院：庭外和解后家属不得再索工伤死亡赔偿","summary":"巴西高等劳动法院第五合议庭维持原判，认定网约车司机家属签署的庭外和解协议已全面清偿事故相关权利，不得再诉请新的赔偿。","body":"巴西高等劳动法院（TST）第五合议庭维持下级法院判决，驳回一名网约车司机家属在已签署庭外和解协议后提出的新赔偿请求。该司机2022年8月在弗洛里亚诺波利斯因交通事故死亡，年仅23岁；Uber巴西公司此前与家属达成和解，家属获10万雷亚尔保险金并签署涵盖事故相关精神和物质损害赔偿的条款。\n\n据Consultor Jurídico报道，合议庭认为Uber巴西公司与家属签署的庭外和解协议约定对事故相关权利和款项进行全面清偿。报告法官Alexandre Ramos指出，尽管情况特殊，但协议涵盖精神、 aesthetic 和物质损害赔偿；圣卡塔琳娜州第12区劳动法院未认定家属违背意愿签署或遭诱导、胁迫，因此不得就同一事故再请求赔偿。该决定为一致通过。\n\n司机自2021年2月起在弗洛里亚诺波利斯在该平台接单，2022年8月死亡，车上乘客母子二人亦丧生。家属向劳动法院起诉，要求认定劳动关系并判令公司支付精神损害赔偿。Uber方面主张司机为自主经营者，并称家属已因保险合同获得10万雷亚尔，且签署了涵盖事故所致损害（包括精神和物质损害）的条款。\n\n2024年2月，圣若泽第二劳动法院驳回家属请求，未认定劳动关系，并认为没有证据使庭外和解协议无效。圣卡塔琳娜州第12区劳动法院维持该判决，家属随后上诉至巴西高等劳动法院。案件编号为RR 0000040-22.2023.5.12.0032。","why_it_matters":null,"cbi_observation":null,"direction_tag":"巴西","primary_category":"营商环境","secondary_topics":["法律","司法案件"],"content_level":"编辑整理","event_type":"司法案件","audience_tags":[],"event_location":null,"verification_status":"unverified","published_at":"2026-11-09T11:06:36.947Z","display_date":"2026-11-09","source_published_at":null,"source_url":"https://conjur.com.br/2026-nov-09/acordo-extrajudicial-impede-pagamento-de-nova-indenizacao-por-morte-no-trabalho/","source_name":"Consultor Jurídico (Conjur)","source_language":"pt","author_name":"编辑部","risk_level":"low","risk_flags":["legal_risk"],"opportunity_flags":[],"trend_signals":["judicial_precedent_consolidation"]},"intelligence":{"intel_id":"fbb0ae8a-9dcd-430c-b92b-3d8e972ac0fb","version":1,"event_type":"司法判决","event_date":null,"main_entities":[{"name":"巴西高等劳动法院（TST）第五合议庭","role":"审理并维持原判的司法机构","type":"government_body","country":"巴西","normalized_name":null},{"name":"Uber巴西公司","role":"与家属达成庭外和解的网约车平台公司","type":"company","country":"巴西","normalized_name":null},{"name":"网约车司机家属","role":"已签署庭外和解后提出新赔偿请求的原告","type":"person","country":"巴西","normalized_name":null},{"name":"Alexandre Ramos","role":"TST报告法官","type":"person","country":"巴西","normalized_name":null},{"name":"圣卡塔琳娜州第12区劳动法院","role":"维持一审判决的下级劳动法院","type":"government_body","country":"巴西","normalized_name":null},{"name":"弗洛里亚诺波利斯","role":"事故及司机接单发生地","type":"location","country":"巴西","normalized_name":null}],"main_action":"TST第五合议庭维持原判，认定庭外和解已全面清偿，家属不得再索赔","key_numbers":[{"unit":"雷亚尔","label":"和解保险金","value":"100000"},{"unit":"岁","label":"司机死亡年龄","value":"23"},{"unit":"人","label":"事故死亡人数","value":"3"}],"facts":[{"verified":false,"statement":"巴西高等劳动法院（TST）第五合议庭维持下级法院判决，驳回网约车司机家属在已签署庭外和解协议后提出的新赔偿请求。","source_excerpt":null},{"verified":false,"statement":"该司机于2022年8月在弗洛里亚诺波利斯因交通事故死亡，年仅23岁；车上乘客母子二人亦丧生。","source_excerpt":null},{"verified":false,"statement":"Uber巴西公司此前与家属达成庭外和解，家属获10万雷亚尔保险金并签署涵盖事故相关精神和物质损害赔偿的条款。","source_excerpt":null},{"verified":false,"statement":"报告法官Alexandre Ramos指出，协议涵盖精神、aesthetic（美学）和物质损害赔偿；圣卡塔琳娜州第12区劳动法院未认定家属违背意愿签署或遭诱导、胁迫。","source_excerpt":null},{"verified":false,"statement":"2024年2月，圣若泽第二劳动法院驳回家属请求，未认定劳动关系，并认为没有证据使庭外和解协议无效；家属随后上诉至TST。","source_excerpt":null},{"verified":false,"statement":"案件编号为RR 0000040-22.2023.5.12.0032。","source_excerpt":null}],"assessments":[{"statement":"该判决强化了庭外和解协议对同一事故后续索赔的终局效力，平台企业在类似案件中面临追加赔偿的风险有所下降。","confidence":"medium","basis_fact_index":null},{"statement":"判决并未直接认定Uber与司机存在劳动关系，但确认和解协议有效，可能促使家属在签署和解前更谨慎审查条款。","confidence":"medium","basis_fact_index":null},{"statement":"该案可能作为TST处理平台用工事故和解赔偿的参考判例。","confidence":"medium","basis_fact_index":null}],"actions":[{"target":"system","priority":"normal","description":"跟踪TST判决全文及是否形成统一判例口径"},{"target":"user","priority":"high","description":"提示在巴平台企业审查庭外和解协议中全面清偿条款和保险赔付衔接"},{"target":"both","priority":"normal","description":"关注案件编号RR 0000040-22.2023.5.12.0032后续执行或上诉情况"}],"affected_audience":["网约车司机家属","Uber巴西公司","在巴网约车平台企业","劳动法律从业者"],"risk_flags":["legal_risk"],"opportunity_flags":[],"trend_signals":["judicial_precedent_consolidation"],"follow_up_needed":true,"follow_up_questions":["TST第五合议庭判决的具体作出日期和是否已终局？","庭外和解协议全文是否明确列明放弃所有事故相关请求？","该判决对Uber在巴西的司机劳动关系认定及其他平台同类案件有何影响？","10万雷亚尔保险金与和解赔偿金的法律性质如何区分？"],"related_topics":["巴西劳动法","庭外和解协议","网约车平台用工","工伤死亡赔偿","TST判例"],"verification_status":"unverified","confidence_score":0.7,"generated_at":"2026-11-09T11:07:05.046Z"},"meta":{"canonical_url":"https://chinabrazilinsight.com/news/article-20261109-74d7ee","api_url":"https://chinabrazilinsight.com/api/public/content/article-20261109-74d7ee","markdown_url":"https://chinabrazilinsight.com/api/public/content/article-20261109-74d7ee?view=markdown","json_url":"https://chinabrazilinsight.com/api/public/content/article-20261109-74d7ee?view=json","last_updated":"2026-11-09T11:07:05.116Z","platform":"China Brazil Insight","platform_url":"https://chinabrazilinsight.com"}}