{"editorial":{"content_id":"a42850a3-a5f7-45d4-8623-261096471431","slug":"article-20261102-73303e","content_type":"news","title":"圣保罗法院：重整后产生的劳动债权不纳入债权人名单","summary":"圣保罗州法院第二企业法保留法庭一致驳回一名前雇员的上诉，维持不将其8.01万雷亚尔劳动债权纳入金属加工企业Pérsico Pizzamiglio司法重整债权人名单的判决。","body":"圣保罗州法院（TJ-SP）第二企业法保留法庭一致驳回一名前雇员的上诉，维持下级法院判决，拒绝将其8.01万雷亚尔劳动债权纳入金属加工企业Pérsico Pizzamiglio的司法重整债权人名单。该员工在劳动诉讼中获认权利后另行提起债权确认之诉，其中包含因听力损失获得的1万雷亚尔精神损害赔偿。\n\n下级法院认定该债权具有破产程序外债权性质，且债务人重整程序已终结。判决理由为：相关工资、附随及解约款项产生于2012年的持续给付和合同解除，晚于2004年重整计划提交和2005年重整批准。\n\n案件报告人、法官Fábio Tabosa援引巴西高等法院（STJ）第1.051号重复主题的立场：“为确定债权是否受司法重整效力约束，债权的存在以事实发生之日为准。”他指出，法律关系起始日期并不重要，因为仅凭关系成立不足以形成随时间推移或后续事件产生的权利，如持续提供劳动服务所产生的债权。\n\n关于FGTS 40%罚款，Tabosa表示该罚款不按服务时间比例分割，其事实发生单一，与无正当理由解雇之时重合；尽管账户余额由雇佣期间多次存款形成，罚款的事实发生并不分散于整个期间，而是唯一且与2012年7月20日的解雇重合。\n\n关于听力损失赔偿，报告人认为仅主张疾病在劳动合同期间发展不足以自动追溯事实发生之日，劳动者须证明损害在重整申请前已固化。他总结称，义务的劳动性质不足以决定其纳入一般债权人名单，分类的前提是债权须受重整约束，而本案不符合。\n\nTabosa还强调，劳动法院出具的证明不约束重整法院对债权是否属于重整范围的判断，且公司重整的最终终结在二审中维持，故须确认一审驳回判决。","why_it_matters":null,"cbi_observation":null,"direction_tag":"巴西","primary_category":"营商环境","secondary_topics":["法律","司法案件","合规"],"content_level":"编辑整理","event_type":"司法案件","audience_tags":[],"event_location":null,"verification_status":"unverified","published_at":"2026-11-02T11:02:03.281Z","display_date":"2026-11-02","source_published_at":null,"source_url":"https://conjur.com.br/2026-nov-02/tj-sp-mantem-exclusao-de-credito-trabalhista-de-recuperacao-judicial/","source_name":"Consultor Jurídico (Conjur)","source_language":"pt","author_name":"编辑部","risk_level":"low","risk_flags":["legal_risk","compliance_risk"],"opportunity_flags":[],"trend_signals":[]},"intelligence":{"intel_id":"69818133-405b-4039-9749-b87a644cddaa","version":1,"event_type":"司法判决","event_date":null,"main_entities":[{"name":"圣保罗州法院第二企业法保留法庭","role":"作出二审判决，维持不将劳动债权纳入司法重整债权人名单","type":"government_body","country":"巴西","normalized_name":null},{"name":"Pérsico Pizzamiglio","role":"金属加工企业、司法重整债务人","type":"company","country":"巴西","normalized_name":null},{"name":"前雇员（上诉人）","role":"主张将8.01万雷亚尔劳动债权纳入重整债权人名单","type":"person","country":"巴西","normalized_name":null},{"name":"Fábio Tabosa","role":"案件报告人、法官，阐述裁判理由","type":"person","country":"巴西","normalized_name":null},{"name":"巴西高等法院（STJ）第1.051号重复主题","role":"被援引的判例立场，确定债权是否受司法重整约束以事实发生之日为准","type":"policy","country":"巴西","normalized_name":null}],"main_action":"圣保罗州法院维持劳动债权不纳入司法重整债权人名单的判决","key_numbers":[{"unit":"万雷亚尔","label":"劳动债权金额","value":"8.01"},{"unit":"万雷亚尔","label":"精神损害赔偿金额","value":"1"},{"unit":"日期","label":"解雇日期","value":"2012-07-20"},{"unit":"年","label":"重整计划提交年份","value":"2004"},{"unit":"年","label":"重整批准年份","value":"2005"}],"facts":[{"verified":false,"statement":"圣保罗州法院第二企业法保留法庭一致驳回一名前雇员的上诉，维持不将其8.01万雷亚尔劳动债权纳入Pérsico Pizzamiglio司法重整债权人名单的判决。","source_excerpt":null},{"verified":false,"statement":"该劳动债权包含因听力损失获得的1万雷亚尔精神损害赔偿。","source_excerpt":null},{"verified":false,"statement":"下级法院认定相关工资、附随及解约款项产生于2012年的持续给付和合同解除，晚于2004年重整计划提交和2005年重整批准。","source_excerpt":null},{"verified":false,"statement":"案件报告人Fábio Tabosa援引巴西高等法院（STJ）第1.051号重复主题的立场：为确定债权是否受司法重整效力约束，债权的存在以事实发生之日为准。","source_excerpt":null},{"verified":false,"statement":"Fábio Tabosa表示FGTS 40%罚款的事实发生单一，与2012年7月20日无正当理由解雇之时重合。","source_excerpt":null},{"verified":false,"statement":"Fábio Tabosa认为劳动法院出具的证明不约束重整法院对债权是否属于重整范围的判断。","source_excerpt":null},{"verified":false,"statement":"公司重整的最终终结在二审中维持，故须确认一审驳回判决。","source_excerpt":null}],"assessments":[{"statement":"该判决强化了司法重整中劳动债权按事实发生日判断是否纳入债权人名单的裁判口径。","confidence":"high","basis_fact_index":null},{"statement":"对于在巴西经历司法重整的企业，重整后产生的劳动债权可能被认定为重整程序外债权，需按重整外债权处理。","confidence":"medium","basis_fact_index":null},{"statement":"劳动法院出具的债权证明在重整范围判断上不具有当然约束力，重整法院保留独立判断空间。","confidence":"medium","basis_fact_index":null},{"statement":"员工主张听力损失赔偿时，需证明损害在重整申请前已固化，仅主张疾病在劳动合同期间发展可能不足。","confidence":"medium","basis_fact_index":null},{"statement":"该信息为单来源报道，判决日期和案号缺失，实际适用需核实判决全文。","confidence":"low","basis_fact_index":null}],"actions":[{"target":"user","priority":"high","description":"检索并研读本案判决全文，确认案号、判决日期及上诉状态"},{"target":"both","priority":"normal","description":"将在巴中资企业司法重整中的劳动债权申报与分类纳入合规检查清单"},{"target":"system","priority":"normal","description":"持续跟踪STJ第1.051号重复主题及圣保罗州法院后续适用案例"}],"affected_audience":["在巴西司法重整企业","企业债权人","前雇员/劳动者","在巴中资企业"],"risk_flags":["legal_risk","compliance_risk"],"opportunity_flags":[],"trend_signals":[],"follow_up_needed":true,"follow_up_questions":["本案判决日期和案号是什么？","该判决是否已终审或仍可上诉？","对在巴中资企业重整债权申报有何具体操作影响？","重整终结后该前雇员劳动债权如何执行？"],"related_topics":["司法重整","劳动债权","债权人名单","巴西劳动法","STJ第1.051号重复主题","FGTS罚款","听力损失赔偿"],"verification_status":"unverified","confidence_score":0.7,"generated_at":"2026-11-02T11:02:24.782Z"},"meta":{"canonical_url":"https://chinabrazilinsight.com/news/article-20261102-73303e","api_url":"https://chinabrazilinsight.com/api/public/content/article-20261102-73303e","markdown_url":"https://chinabrazilinsight.com/api/public/content/article-20261102-73303e?view=markdown","json_url":"https://chinabrazilinsight.com/api/public/content/article-20261102-73303e?view=json","last_updated":"2026-11-02T11:02:24.840Z","platform":"China Brazil Insight","platform_url":"https://chinabrazilinsight.com"}}